Maruti Brezza Vs Maruti Fronx Comparison

Maruti Suzuki, one of India's leading automobile manufacturers, has introduced two impressive offerings in the sub-compact SUV segment - the Brezza and the Maruti Suzuki Fronx. Both vehicles possess distinct features and specifications, making them popular choices among car enthusiasts. In this article, we will compare the Brezza and the Maruti Fronx, highlighting their key differences and helping you make an informed decision.

 

Dimensions and Styling
The Maruti Fronx, being a crossover, features a shorter height of 1550 mm compared to the Brezza's 1685 mm. However, both cars share the same length of 3995 mm. The Brezza is wider by 25 mm, while the Fronx boasts a 20 mm longer wheelbase than its counterpart. Regarding styling, the Brezza exudes a boxy appeal, while the Fronx takes a more curvy and sleek approach, drawing inspiration from the Grand Vitara. The Fronx stands out with its sloping roofline and plastic cladding, setting it apart from the Brezza.

 
Platform
The Maruti Suzuki Brezza is built on the Suzuki Global C platform, and the Grand Vitara and the Toyota Urban Cruiser Hyryder are also utilized. On the other hand, the Maruti Fronx is constructed on Maruti Suzuki's Heartect platform, which is shared with models like the Baleno and the XL6. The choice of media influences the vehicles' overall performance and driving dynamics.

 

Features and Safety Tech
Both the Maruti Fronx and the Brezza come equipped with an impressive array of features. They offer a 9-inch touchscreen infotainment system with wireless smartphone connectivity, OTA updates, Arkamys sound system, 360-degree camera, heads-up display, TFT display for the instrument cluster, Suzuki Connect connected-car tech, and essential safety features like six airbags, ESP, Hill Hold Assist, and cruise control. However, the Brezza gains an advantage by including an electric sunroof and ambient lighting, providing an enhanced driving experience. Compare cars in India based on features before buying.


Engine and Transmission
The Maruti Fronx offers two engine options. It comes with the 1.2-litre mild-hybrid NA petrol engine from the Baleno, generating 89 bhp of power and 113 Nm of torque. Additionally, it features a new 1.0-litre turbo petrol motor producing 98 bhp of power and 148 Nm of torque. Both engines come with a 5-speed manual transmission as standard, with the 1.2-liter variant having an optional 5-speed AMT and the 1.0-liter variant offering a 6-speed automatic transmission. The Maruti Brezza, on the other hand, is powered by a sole 1.5-litre four-cylinder naturally aspirated petrol engine, delivering 103 bhp of power and 137 Nm of torque. It comes with a 5-speed manual transmission as standard, along with an optional 6-speed automatic transmission.

 
Price
The starting price for the Maruti Brezza for Lxi (Petrol) is Rs. 8.29 lakh, while the Maruti Fronx price for Sigma (Petrol) is Rs. 7.46 lakh. Brezza's top-of-the-line engine is 1462 cc (petrol), whereas Fronx's is 1197 cc (compressed natural gas).

Conclusion Choosing between the Maruti Brezza and the Maruti Fronx can be challenging, given their unique features and specifications. While the Brezza offers a more upright and boxy design, the Fronx's sleek and curvaceous styling stands out. Both vehicles provide advanced features, safety technologies, and efficient engines. The pricing and positioning of both Maruti Suzuki cars are also essential factors to consider. Ultimately, your choice should depend on your preferences, budget, and specific requirements.

Yamaha MT 15 V2 Vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Comparison

The Yamaha MT 15 V2 and the Apache RTR 200 4V are two popular motorcycles in the 150cc-200cc segment in India. Both bikes offer sporty performance, stylish design, and advanced features. This article will compare these two motorcycles in terms of specifications, performance, features, and more.

 
Engine and Performance
The Yamaha MT-15 V2 is powered by a 155cc liquid-cooled DOHC engine with Yamaha bikes Variable Valve Actuation (VVA) system and Fuel Injection. It produces 19.1 bhp of power and 14.8 Nm of torque, mated to a 6-speed gearbox. On the other hand, the TVS Apache RTR 200 4V features a 197cc oil-cooled SOHC engine that generates 21 bhp of power and 18.5 Nm of torque, paired with a 5-speed gearbox. Both bikes offer impressive performance in their respective segments, with the Apache RTR 200 4V having a slight advantage in terms of power output.

 

Design and Features
In terms of design, the Yamaha MT-15 V2 takes inspiration from its elder MT siblings, featuring a sharp and aggressive naked streetfighter look. It sports bug-shaped LED headlamps and alloy wheels borrowed from the R15 V3. The TVS Apache RTR 200 4V, on the other hand, has a fresh and stylish design with sculpted headlamps, DRLs, and a sporty split seat. Both bikes have unique aesthetics, with the MT-15 V2 having a more mature and refined appearance, while the Apache RTR 200 4V offers a bold and funky look.

Both motorcycles come equipped with advanced features. The Yamaha MT-15 V2 and Apache RTR 200 4V offer fully digital instrument clusters, LED lighting, dual-channel ABS, and a slipper clutch. The Apache RTR 200 4V also boasts features like electronic fuel injection, LED DRLs, and a race-spec split seat. Overall, both bikes provide a well-rounded package of style and features.

 
Ride and Handling
The Yamaha MT-15 V2 and the Apache RTR 200 4V excel in ride and handling. The MT-15 V2 offers a relaxed riding posture, making it comfortable for long rides. Its 6-speed transmission allows for smooth gear shifts, and the presence of the VVA system enhances low-end torque and mid-range power delivery. On the other hand, the Apache RTR 200 4V offers a sportier riding experience with its agile handling and precise maneuverability. Its refined suspension setup ensures a smooth and stable ride, even on rough surfaces.

 
Price and Verdict
Regarding pricing, the starting MT 15 V2 price is Rs 1.65 lakhs (ex-showroom), while the base variant of the Apache RTR 200 4V is priced at Rs. 1.38 lakhs (ex-showroom). The Apache RTR 200 4V offers a bigger engine and a more affordable price point, making it an attractive option for those seeking a performance-oriented motorcycle on a budget. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-15 V2 provides a refined riding experience, premium features, and legendary Yamaha performance, making it a preferred choice for enthusiasts seeking a combination of style and power.

 
Conclusion

The Yamaha MT-15 V2 and Apache RTR 200 4V are impressive motorcycles in their respective categories. The MT-15 V2 offers a refined riding experience, distinctive design, and advanced features, while the Apache RTR 200 4V provides a powerful engine, sporty handling, and attractive pricing. Ultimately, choosing these two bikes depends on individual preferences and priorities. Whether you prioritize comfort and sophistication or raw power and affordability, both motorcycles deliver a thrilling riding experience on Indian roads. Always compare bikes in India before buying.

Mahindra Thar vs Hyundai Creta Comparison

Due to the rise in popularity of compact and subcompact SUVs, this sector of vehicles has become one of the most sought-after. The compact SUV sector gained popularity thanks to the Creta. Or the Mahindra Thar, an off-road vehicle with its own cult. If you have INR 12-20 lakhs in your pocket, you could decide between the Creta and the Thar. Then why? Let's compare cars in India before buying any of the two.

 
Do looks matter?
Looks are entirely subjective. One could like the Mahindra cars intimidating appearance and robust road presence. You may select the classic shape in a brand-new incarnation. Or you may appreciate the Wrangler-inspired style. However, a few people could still think the Hyundai Creta is attractive. But as was already said, the Thar stands out because of its unique appearance and commanding presence on the road.

 
Overall utility
Are you searching for enough seating, a large boot, comfortable seats, and a panoramic sunroof? The Creta is ideal for people who want a daily driver with an SUV attitude. Everyone will appreciate the comfort Hyundai has given to the SUV, whether they are sitting in the front row or the back. This does not imply that Thar is a subpar utility vehicle. It's only that having a boot room and being able to seat passengers in the second row are options. Although the driving dynamics have been enhanced, the giant stance makes Thar a little difficult to operate daily.

 
Dimensions
Thar has a much more significant road presence than Hyundai Creta since it is higher and broader. However, the wheelbase and total length of the Creta are longer. The Creta's boot has a 433-liter capacity as a consequence. That is where Thar fails. In addition, the Thar has just four seats compared to the five of the Creta.

Powertrain Comparison
We'll be contrasting the engine options offered in the specific models we started with, namely the Thar LX Diesel AT and the Creta SX.

In this category, there is no question of who won. The Thar offers a more powerful diesel engine and automatic gearbox. Furthermore, the Thar is predominantly a 4X4 SUV. Mahindra Thar price is worth its powertrain.

 
Safety Features Comparison
Both SUVs come with a lot of safety equipment. Thar received a rating of 4 stars from the Global NCAP for both kid and adult occupancy. Creta, meanwhile, still needs to undergo testing. However, the same-platform Kia Seltos received a 3-star rating for adult occupancy and a 2-star rating for kid occupancy. In this case, the Thar is undoubtedly a safer SUV.

 
Verdict Both SUVs are loaded with security features. The Global NCAP gave the Thar 4 stars for child and adult occupancy. On the other hand, the Creta still needs to be tested. However, the same-platform Kia Seltos were rated as 2-stars for children's occupancy and 3-stars for adults. The Thar is unquestionably a safer SUV in this situation.

Compare Renault Kwid vs Tata Punch

Tata Punch Price starts at Rs. 6.00 Lakh (ex-showroom) for Pure MT, whereas the Renault Kwid Price starts at Rs. 4.70 Lakh (ex-showroom) for the 1.0 RXE. Tata Punch is a 3-cylinder, 1199 cc Engine that can create 84 bhp at 6000 rpm, whereas Kwid is a 3-cylinder, 999 cc engine that can generate 53.26 bhp at 5600 rpm. Kwid has a top model mileage of 21.46 km/l, whereas Punch offers a maximum model mileage of 18.97 km/l.

 
Safety
ASR/Traction Control, Central Locking, EBD (Electronic Brake-force Distribution), and ISOFIX (Child-Seat Mount) are all standard on the Renault Kwid. The Punch comes with a rear-view camera, as well as ABS (Anti-lock Braking System), Auto-Dimming Rear-View Mirror, Automatic Headlamps, ESP (Electronic Stability Program), and ISOFIX (Child-Seat Mount).

 

Engine
Kwid has a 3-cylinder, 999 cc petrol Engine that produces 91 Nm of torque at 4250 rpm and 67 bhp at 5500 rpm. However, the Tata Punch has a 3-cylinder, 1199 cc, 1.2 Revotron Engine Petrol engine that produces 84 bhp at 6000 rpm and 113 Nm at 3300 rpm in terms of power and torque.

 
Body

Five doors and five seats are on Renault cars. It is a hatchback with a 279-liter trunk, a 28-liter petrol tank, and 184 mm ground clearance. It is 3731 mm long, 1579 mm broad, and 1474 mm high. Its curb weight is 698 KG, and its wheelbase is 2422 mm. As an alternative, Punch is an SUV with five doors, five seats, a gasoline tank size of 37 liters, a cargo area of 366 liters, and a ground clearance of 187 millimeters. It is 1615 mm tall, 3827 mm long, 1742 mm wide, and weighs 1000 Kg at the curb.

 
Brakes, Suspensions, and Tyres

Drum brakes are installed in the rear wheels of the Renault Kwid, along with Disc brakes, a MacPherson strut, a lower Transverse Link Suspension, a Twist Beam Suspension, and Coil Spring Suspension. Its front tires are 165/70 in size. Punch, in contrast, features Disc brakes and Coil Spring suspension with 185/70 R15-sized front wheels. Drum brakes are on the back wheels. Always Compare cars in India before getting it, right over at autoX.

 
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Renault Kwid and Tata Punch are two impressive compact SUVs that offer excellent value for money. While the Kwid stands out for its spacious interior and fuel efficiency, the Punch impresses with its powerful engine and high ground clearance.

The Renault Kwid and Punch are two excellent options for those looking for an affordable and reliable compact SUV with impressive features. It's essential to take each vehicle for a test drive and carefully consider your needs before making a final decision.

Hero Xtreme 160R 4V Overview

The Xtreme 160R, a motorbike in the sub-200cc roadster market, has been just updated by Hero MotoCorp. This product is offered in three variations in India, which are distinguishable by their unique features, hardware, and color choices. Here, we cover everything about the Hero Xtreme 160R 4V variation.

 
Design
The already attractive 160R hasn't altered much, but the Hero Xtreme 160R 4V looks more aggressive because of its golden forks. These feature a 37mm diameter, which, combined with the Xtreme's slim stance, gives them a much beefier appearance than the ones we've seen on the Pulsar NS 160. A split seat is an additional option that gives the illusion of being sportier.

All of these new items may be retrofitted on the earlier 2V type because the mounting locations or cycle parts haven't changed, adding more power in the form of a belly pan with the 4V badging. Additionally, there are new paint possibilities, such as a daring, unique color combination of a metallic blue and a matte high-visibility yellow, my favorite on the 4V, but it has a matte surface that quickly gets exceptionally filthy. To simulate the attitude of a raging bull, Hero has reduced the location of the LED headlamp and placed tiny winglets beneath. Still, it may not be easy to notice this alteration. The Xtreme 160R 4V price is worth all the features and specifications this Hero bikes gives.

 

 
Powertrain
However, looking closely, you will see a little radiator directly beneath the tank. Since the competition already has one, this is an oil cooler. Although it wasn't necessary, improved cooling is always appreciated in a nation like ours. Even though the engine is air-cooled, this radiator circulates the oil to provide better cooling. The Xtreme's 160cc single engine is a dependable older model that has recently complied with the BSVI phase two requirements and the E20 fuel blend. However, this bike has a four-valve head. It aids in more refined engine behavior and more effective fuel combustion.

It has a distinct advantage over the outdated NS 160 and feels as polished as the brand-new Pulsar N 160 or Apache RTR 160 4V, if not better. So these are the Hero Xtreme 160R 4V specifications.

 

 
Ride and handling
The Standard version of the Hero Xtreme 160R 4V Features has standard 37mm forks, whereas the Pro model you see here uses 37mm forks that are upside down. Although we could not ride the Standard, the 2V version, which uses comparable circuitry, is expected to feel the same. The Pro variant's upside-down forks are advantageous since they provide a more controlled front-end feel and less dip while braking. The new Xtreme maintains its light and elegant feel even with the 4-5kg weight increase from the latest gear, whether riding through city traffic or along winding roads. While a dual-channel system would have been safer, the 4V uses a single-channel ABS design. Despite this, the braking performance is generally satisfactory. The brakes seem secure, and the levers have a progressive feel. However, when braking on the gravel, you must be cautious.